碳税和碳交易机制的行业减排成本比较优势研究.pdf

Òj 9 ‡cªNÅú ï Ê[¼ 12 ¼ 1 ú2016 N 1  CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCHVol. 12 No. 1January 2016doi10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2015.117§Ô , , ‡ ¶ò , ² õ , ª . ¦  _ Ʀœ i ‡ï2 ¡«ú ï [J]. ªNÅú ï Ê[ , 2016, 12 1 53-60¦  _ Ʀœ i ‡ï2 ¡«ú ï§Ô ,2
ȇ ¶ò2
Ȳ õ3
ȧ Â2
Èv2 þŒ ªNÅ
 fÆÒj 9 ‡c_ ‡ p ì ¦ØwH_
Òj 9 ‡c6 Ù¦ §þ  Ö 
Ȧ
Ä 
ªNŦ
È CT
Å   ‡c „_ Æ
Ä fì _ Æ
È ETS
—
Å _óTŒ©LX¦Í ã6 Ùn
ÈtŒDhÇ Ý 7ЦŽ   ¶ 6Ø\1
ÈÍ ã6 ÙsU 6 Ùï[ ìó«
 ÐTW 2006 N ý 8T· ¢¦ 8™¦B2  Wœ
¦Æ“ ª[ ì[ 8ú ï
È 2013 N3 
ÈŽ ‡œï 
ÐÀ § ÷  TÍ ã º¦2ÐT TÑþÝ øú ïï
ÈÝ621751
3Ø j Ù-Ñþ
ÈØ j515111L2
Ö ¦  _ Æ_ fÆÒj 9 ‡c¦Í ã6 Ùþ 
Èþœ¦ i ‡ï0–Z
\ë š fÆ §¦Ø ú­÷ïg•º  z i ‡ïg•
È2 ¡¦  _ Æ0¤ Dœ i ‡ï
ÈD–Z ÖÍ ã6 Ùþ ï¦2Î
\ë ÷ë¤ Dœ¦M¤•Êœ  Ft
È¥Ÿ Ã0 ³ ƒ
Ö“ O ¦¦ r¶ ƒwI
ȯÀ _ Æ´2 ¡Û¦ z“ï
Ȧø ï«
 ú
ȯÀ i ‡ 0h Çï ¡Û
ÈÑ Æ ¦œ 6 ÙnN2
È _ Æø ïsn
 O
¦¦ r
L E W ¥ 0¦ Oí
 è ú
 _ z“Ñ6 Ùïü÷–Z _ Æ ¦ i ‡ï ¦2 ¡«
 zq“ »™ ‡c6 Ù §G‡
ÈQ¦  _ Æéó2¦Æ«
2 pN
Ö  _ Æ
¦
i ‡ï
¤ Dœ
ë9má ± ú
Ö 2015-06-12
ªî ± ú
Ö 2015-10-10ú\
Ö žã‡ §Ô÷ TÑú ïÄ\
¦Ñ _ Ʀœ6 Ù«Ñs rú ï

Ä 15YJAZH024
Å
ë92 — TÑ  Â\
Ä 2014A030313671
Å
T F T 0§ë Ä1 \6
Ä 2012BAC20B12-06
ÅU f »
Ö §Ô ,
È p
È­ú ïõ
È
v
ÄZ‘U
Å
È p
Èú ïõ
È
—¯À ‡c „ _ Æ
Ä ETS
Å
È c ²[ Æ
Ä CDM
Å  ô‡ i ‡ Æ
Ä JI
Ō Ùü qè
0 3Ö 3  i ‡ Æ
Èü W\쮺 _ Æ
ÈÔ* ƒ¦_ ‡c „ _ Æ
È ETS
Ⱥ f ²  o
È } ETS fìº _ Æ
F
ÄÃ-á
Å
\2
È F }Dœ ‡ëmoÀºÍ ã º¦
Èj CO2‡c™mÍ ã º¦
I
È ‡c„ _ ÆUºÐT8ŽÍ ã6 Ùn¦Ž ÆY݇tº v 8TlÅœ
È ªÁ 2014 N 6 ¹
ÈÐT 7ò ‡c „ _lÅ9Y Ý ‡‡œï ETS[Ä“
Èj M _
ÀwT FÀ¿
2À z ì‡T ‡c „ _hǦ  g „ þU² _
\3¦Ê¾ ‡
Ð Æîo ªNÅ ô‡3 ý
\45¦‡T ‡c _9 ï Ä
È W 2016 N  ETS }ð wWlź vxŸ ‡T
È Ä 2017 N ï ‡T ‡c _9
¯ÀI©¦ ETS W jÒj 9 ‡ªNÅú ï Ê[54 2016 N¡Ø6ÆÚ6\5-6
ÈÐTÄ ‡c6 ٠Æ
È› ƒeÉ  
 i ‡Òj 9¦I ü Ý 7üÄØè¦Ê
Lwò ‡¯÷Ÿ çæ
È_š Í ã º §¶s ¦Ø2¸T
T N2M¤ú ïW ý
Ȧ ETS¦ï«jeCïƒN
ȃI cIr0j ¡w¶t
ÔË5Æ™œ
ÈZW¦ ETS¦ï¶s ÊœªÙ
È ý “ ÖÍ ã6Ùþ ¦s©T· 2 p2Î
ȺÐTÄ“  «R¦Í ã ºÆ5 §– J
2T ”¶2¦ FUT¦* ƒUºÍ ã6 Ùn
Èî ƒ™m¦Ï_MA_
Èü÷ ¦4Â
º v¦ Ý 7[Ï ³ ÝšÂ4Cè–Z
ȺF è 0ï¡Ø6Æ
È T  ÷2\‡¦  ETSMœ ‡c6 Ù
¦÷2 yT FMœ
Èp ¨
 ¨
 t°
 ÌÆ † ›W 20X A 90 N 8T™m¦
È ˆT
Ä 2001N
Å
 ±
Ä 2002 N
Å
 Ðw çñ
Ä 2011 N
ŪTeÄ z ì T¦¦Æ
 2005 N ï  ‡ pLw y Ñ ‡c _9
Ä EU-ETS
Å
È ®Ã y Ñ 27òïõT
 G w ‹ Y9
 ±ë Ùü
 ÆT GÝ
cTªT F º v 8Tn z ì ETS
‡©¦  _ ÖÍ ã6 Ù Æ”-CuT F ºvÏ }¦  _9‡ z ì°‡™Í ã6 ÙÆ
È2 ¡Æ™¦_ˆT
 t° ¤T
ˆT–Ñ _¦ ôΦ i è
È t°¦®Ã¦CO2ŸT ‡c¦ 68
È–Ñ EU-ETS ¦ ¦CO2‡c ‡T¦ 35
40\7-8
¦
 _ ° ‡™Í ã6 Ù Æó¶ çA
ȃ¦T F ºv
 ƒ  Ý 7[ ©
 Æ¦Í ã6 ÙsU M9 Ý 7¦–ZóƒN
T ”с¦¦ Ý 7 Í ã–ZY Ý Êœw ¶n¦í
È ETS ¦¢5–Z à O\T”úïº÷
È„uú ï º ÊC ú ï¦ ETSƒº v¦Í ã6 Ù s5 M¦‘
ÐT¡5 穦fÆ CO2‡c0ï¦óÖ¢5–Z¦_gÐWª\9
Èñ Ít ™m¦ øio
 CO2‡c ø Oí¦–Z
L ýÿª\10zì Í ã TÑÍ ãh¦ ™
È* ÐT i 5
 10 20 CO2‡cI´2™m¦¦ Ê ú  ú¦–Z
ÈIt ƒ g à0™m¦I CO2i ‡¦ï
Û ¶gª\11«º™m¦‡¯ CO2‡c }QÐT Ý 7 „1Å
§  3ª\12«º¯¦ r¦¦[ÄÐT¦ Ý 7–Z º¶L
Ë ýª\13© CGE ™
È W â ï ™tZ¦¦ rº 10 î /t
 20 î /t
 30 î /t
 40 î /t
 70î /t ¦ CO2‡c\ óœ¦Â OíT èªÑ à O
Ⱥú ï 8™¦Ú65  TѶs¦•t§ë
T” ETSÍ ã6 Ù s[ ì¦ à O÷2 Ð ETS  ê› ð¦–Z œ [ ì
È÷2¨ØÀ 4Âï–Zt
Èú ï[F\ îM îC ‡ š ™ªþ º÷
 Oberndorferª\14 ETSô  ê› ð|¦–Z à OÔE Êœ9Ž
ÈDMA ‡c6 Ù ¦ ê› ð 80 ðj Á¶0ïBø–Z
Demailly ª\15ç© š™ Åt  EU-ETS  y ÑÒN ¦ ê› ð–Z
È D 9 ê› ð¦–Z/²
Jeffª\16W6 Ùï
 lïª[ ì¦ ETS Êœ 2 ¡ à O
ÈD ETS6 Ùï jƒ ¶ õS«
Zhangª\17 Î ú¶2 EU-ETS¦œ Æ Ý7–Z¦ú ï Êœ  Ù
3  M“ÑÙU z\ ú ï 
ÈÔ\ë š fÆ §¦Ø ú­÷ïg•º \18-19
ÈË5ÐT*ÀETS ”¦œ ¦ 
Ä Ãë ÷ë ± 4000 t Ž™ÅF¤ D,
źú ï
È z i ‡ïg•
È Ò ‡œº™m¦ Mœ ETS6Ù¦ i ‡ï ÊœªÙ
Èj2 ¡ Öƒ¦Í ã6ÙÆ0¦÷ i ‡ïÛ¯
3/2  M“1 œ ‡ ꛦhÇ Û¶ ò  X1 X2
È  ¶Ê ,™
È
ÖNœ
ª 
N1 ú55§Ô ,
Ȫ
Ö¦  _ Ʀœ i ‡ï2 ¡«ú ï i ‡ / ð
 ì N¦ ‡c
 X1 X2¶N ‡c E
˜  ‡c  L A
È EX1EX2
2  ª2 q X1 X2} ‡c fÆ ‡c L
ȍ ¦M  ‡c E ÛÀ  ‡c LA
ȶ EX1EX2A
3 X1ïº vMœ  ETS
È ¯ ªè ‡c j èoc ‡c ¦.
™
È ÃU ¦ ‡c wÀ ‡c L
Ä¼ì ‡c ¦.
ÅI
È X1W\Ë5 Êœ2÷ i ‡
ÈQ ‡c iŸ ‡c L\
ȶ EX11 A
È  W\Ë5WhÇ  š ñ¦ ¦.¸iÒ. ‡c a
ÈQ EX12 A a
4 X2ïº vMœ¦_¦Æ
š
È  ‡c L\ ¦ ‡c ƒ™¦
ȍ ÃU ‡cÒW ªè¦ ‡c L
È ´2Àw*[
Ü[. Œ G zí _ ¦¦ ô‡© [N]. ÐT Ý 7ž , 2012-3-3 C03T
þFÆøj . 2À
ÐÀ § ÷  TÍ ã º¦F
Ä™ qj– JÔE[1][2]oá
Å
 8™ qj o¦Zª [EB/OL]. 2015 [2015-06-11]. http// F[ Àë¿õ÷ ª´ . 2Àxï z ì ‡T ‡c „ _hǦ  g „ þU² _ [J]. ÐT Ý ¹ž , 2015 1 15-16gÎË . Ð Æîo ªNÅ ô‡3 ý [EB/OL]. 2015 [2015-09-26].http// ¨h , Tˆ , ÊC ÿ . Òj 9 i ‡ §Ú6¦ú ï9Ž [J]. 6 Ùà ƒ , 2005, 17 10 467-53m, , ¦Å i ‡ §2 ¡\ âT¦«ÅË5 [J]. [Ž ÝwÑÑ , 2010 4 73-90ì µË . ¦Ñ _¦T Ý 2 ¡t [J].  ¶[ à ƒ ,2012 12 71-76vµ . ¦Ñ _ 2 ¡
T M m V [J].  ¶;™ , 20139 36-39gÐW , .ÊZ . LÆ CO2‡c¦o© à[F [J]. • Ý 7 0 Ý7ú ï , 1994 12 62-66L ýÿ , £» . ÐT CGE ™  ³ ¶2Œ©Ú6
Ä0
Å [J].• Ý 7 0 Ý 7ú ï , 1999 12 24-30Û ¶g , èÔ— . ¦Ñ ‡c [J]. cÀwÑÑ 2 — TÑò , 2002,42 10 1335-1338§  3 , ùÑ , | Y , ª . Œ ªNŦÐT¦ §ú ï [J].ÐTÍ ã TÑ , 2009, 29 1 101-105Ë ý , ±¾À , ¹Ô , ª . ¦¦T ÝÑ º l [J]. Í ã Ý 7 , 20099 28-32Oberndorfer U, Rennings K. Costs and competitiveness effects of theEuropean Union Emissions Trading Scheme [J]. Eur Environ, 2007, 171 1-17Demailly D, Quirion P. European Emission Trading Scheme andcompetitiveness a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. EnergyEconomics, 2008 30 2009-2027Jeff P, Owen A D. Emission Trading Schemes potential revenue effects,compliance costs and overall tax policy issues [J]. Energy Policy, 2009,37 11 4595-4603Zhang Y J, Wei Y M. An overview of current research on EU ETS evidencefrom its operating mechanism and economic effect [J]. Applied Energy,2010, 87 6 1804-1814¾ m ,  , . ‡c „ _ Æ0  i ‡¦2 Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing 404000, ChinaAbstract Both carbon tax and ETS are the environmental management tools to control greenhouse gas emissions,but they may bring different effects about mitigation cost for various industries. Building the GHGs mitigationcost function which based on the steady-state expect social cost function of pollution control policies, and employingit to compare the emission reductions cost of cement industry under the carbon tax or ETS to find the key influencefactors for cutting cost. Taking Guangdong and Shandong provinces’ cement industry as empirical example, thefollowing conclusions can be conducted when there is little difference between the carbon price and carbon taxrate, the carbon tax will be more cost effective than ETS, due to ETS’s higher construction cost. In the short term,because the higher cost of emission reductions of using new technology under mandatory administrative rules,ETS is more cost effective. There are some key factors to impact enterprise’s mitigation cost carbon price, carbontax rate, the price of the best available technology, enterprise anticipation, ETS construction costs, which willaffect the comparative advantage of ETS and carbon tax on the emission reductions costs. At last, We suggest todesign a kind of complementary carbon emission management policies, making the carbon tax and ETS play theirrespective advantages.Key words ETS; carbon tax; cost of emission reductions; the cement industry; Guangdong provinceWang Wenjun1, Xie Pengcheng1, Hu Jilian2, Wang Le1, Zhao Daiqing1Aú ï
 [M].  Ù TÑò , 2008T F[ Àë¿õ÷ . T F[Àë¿øP2À 8[ ‡c „_lÅþU¦Zª [EB/OL]. 2014 [2014-09-01]. http//